Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i am with you nathan. it seems they could have even used the same sensor even in m8, it is the same thing. i think leica screwed a lot of people with the m8 roll out. m9 should have been m8 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>wrote: > I want both, Tina. And the fact that Leica did not improve on this > particular aspect of performance when launching the M9 is a major > disappointment to me. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > > mehrdad wrote: >> >>> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess when m12 >>> is >>> out leica will catch up with todays canon >>> >>> >>> But we don't need 1250 with our fast Leica lenses. Would you rather >> have 1250 iso and crappy lenses or 160 iso and fantastic lenses? I'd >> rather >> have the fantastic fast lenses. >> >> Tina >> www.tinamanley.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad