Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I want both, Tina. And the fact that Leica did not improve on this particular aspect of performance when launching the M9 is a major disappointment to me. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > mehrdad wrote: >> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess >> when m12 is >> out leica will catch up with todays canon >> >> > But we don't need 1250 with our fast Leica lenses. Would you rather > have 1250 iso and crappy lenses or 160 iso and fantastic lenses? > I'd rather have the fantastic fast lenses. > > Tina > www.tinamanley.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information