Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:19 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: > > > Why do we need iso 100,000? I seem to remember we all got along > just fine with iso 400 or 800. Seems like just a race to see who > can supply the highest iso before the next guy. good question... I used to shoot in almost total darkness with asa 400 on film at f1, a Noctilux, that was usually fine... now we have fast lenses with ISO 400-800, even 1200... what am I missing? Steve > > > Gene > > -------------- Original message from mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com>: > -------------- > > >> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess >> when m12 is >> out leica will catch up with todays canon >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, simon jessurun wrote: >> >>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.aspbest,simon >>> amsterdam >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------- >> regards, mehrdad >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information