Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:22:21 +0200
References: <23a0a61f0910211727j22c205e6k6594e6382ca9c0d6@mail.gmail.com> <440b792d0910211759v42bbb4deh802feadf3d60ef93@mail.gmail.com> <102220090519.3930.4ADFEB610000129400000F5A223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

Happy to read that ISO at last went decimal
Phx


grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:

> 
>Why do we need iso 100,000?  I seem to remember we all got along just fine 
>with iso 400 or 800.  Seems like just a race to see who can supply the 
>highest iso before the next guy.
>
>
>Gene
>
> -------------- Original message from mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com>: 
> --------------
>
>
>  
>
>>i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess when m12 
>>is
>>out leica will catch up with todays canon
>>
>>On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, simon jessurun wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.aspbest,simon
>>>amsterdam
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>-- 
>> -------------------------------------
>> regards, mehrdad
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>


In reply to: Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)