Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Same here, Steve, I still shoot at 400 max most of the time, with an occasional 800. Gene -------------- Original message from Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>: -------------- > > On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:19 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: > > > > > > > Why do we need iso 100,000? I seem to remember we all got along > > just fine with iso 400 or 800. Seems like just a race to see who > > can supply the highest iso before the next guy. > > > good question... > > I used to shoot in almost total darkness with asa 400 on film at f1, > a Noctilux, that was usually fine... > > now we have fast lenses with ISO 400-800, even 1200... > > > what am I missing? > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > Gene > > > > -------------- Original message from mehrdad : > > -------------- > > > > > >> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess > >> when m12 is > >> out leica will catch up with todays canon > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, simon jessurun wrote: > >> > >>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.aspbest,simon > >>> amsterdam > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------- > >> regards, mehrdad > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information