Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] X1 to G11 comparison
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:39:32 +0100
References: <8CC003BD9E8F43D-DB4-1870F@webmail-m079.sysops.aol.com> <p06230917c6ced1b43d71@[10.1.16.145]> <9221DF05-259D-474F-8C02-D16DD6B7B0C4@charter.net> <EFCFE92E-8564-4E3C-9C28-5B730A9B1AD0@frozenlight.eu>

I quite agree, though an additional viewfinder will be necessary, at  
least for anyone like me. Personally I see the potential high iso  
quality of large sensor digital as a compensation for a fast lens to a  
large extent. But I was a 64asa person before.
Frank

On 10 Sep, 2009, at 20:25, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> I actually find it quite attractive, if not the price (but that will  
> obviously come down). It reminds me of the Konica Hexar (not RF, the  
> original one). That one also had a fixed 35mm lens and was very  
> good. The only fly in the ointment for me is the lowish maximum  
> aperture of f2.8. In this kind of camera, and for this kind of  
> price, I would really have liked an extra stop.



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] X1 to G11 comparison)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] X1 to G11 comparison)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] X1 to G11 comparison)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] X1 to G11 comparison)