Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/06/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Are we no longer wanted?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:37:16 -0500
References: <4A3D60AB.6020607@gmx.de> <3cad89990906201939s2db48839uc107b2e31a40a5f5@mail.gmail.com> <36172e5a0906202028h6e2ce23bybd3fc25e1ed2a8d2@mail.gmail.com> <3cad89990906202157h1d77be61oe54741b935f4c4c9@mail.gmail.com> <36172e5a0906202232m10836d39p534aa0e533459832@mail.gmail.com> <5A24DE68-BDD2-4851-B310-EDB976ABAD70@cox.net> <36172e5a0906211142p7afad60ds36e7b6212a573991@mail.gmail.com> <8E715F46-C183-4A43-8143-4B647D8D18D8@cox.net>
Leica certainly seems able
to design and produce
beautiful mechanical and optical objects
among the best in the world.
They're a bit behind
in digital and electronics
yet learning and producing
high quality products.
The use of the word "inept" seems out of line.
Badly run to whose criteria?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Jun 21, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
> and criticize an inept, badly run company,
In reply to:
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)