Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] un-believable
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 20 07:03:35 2008
References: <C4BF7AB3-DB7F-43A5-9A3A-62AFC042AE67@mac.com> <20081219185359.04b33c1a@linux-019a.site> <0DA7A328-EA7B-486C-935A-38EB0A012C8C@ameritech.net> <BD27E035DFBE447E84496BA54E55A369@D1S9FY41> <494C3CC0.2010707@gmail.com> <a3f189160812191637j16bef191oc3934155177ca856@mail.gmail.com> <494C4109.7060208@gmail.com> <EB451221806B4A3C98EE41EAFB922007@D1S9FY41> <3cad89990812200651y3220f46elb319cc5593fcfc89@mail.gmail.com>
time will tell
the truth
of this tale
no matter
the prophet's
visions
;~)
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Dec 20, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> The M series film camera bodies, being largely
> mechanical, would be easy to repair even if Leica went under, not
> so the
> digital ones.
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] un-believable)