Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] un-believable
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sat Dec 20 06:51:46 2008
References: <C4BF7AB3-DB7F-43A5-9A3A-62AFC042AE67@mac.com> <20081219185359.04b33c1a@linux-019a.site> <0DA7A328-EA7B-486C-935A-38EB0A012C8C@ameritech.net> <BD27E035DFBE447E84496BA54E55A369@D1S9FY41> <494C3CC0.2010707@gmail.com> <a3f189160812191637j16bef191oc3934155177ca856@mail.gmail.com> <494C4109.7060208@gmail.com> <EB451221806B4A3C98EE41EAFB922007@D1S9FY41>

Seth,
I think it is you who is missing the point. I doubt that the M8 will be
working either, but the Nikon F series would be - I have Nikon bodies that
are 35 years old where everything works. This is not a discussion on the
film line, but digital. The M series film camera bodies, being largely
mechanical, would be easy to repair even if Leica went  under, not so the
digital ones.
Cheers
Jayanand


On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Seth Rosner <sethrosner@nycap.rr.com>wrote:

> Yama, I believe you still miss the point. Will your D80 be functioning
> perfectly ten years from now? twenty? forty? I use regularly a Leica I
> bought almost 45 years ago and lenses that old that were designed over half
> a century ago. They still function perfectly, still with world-class
> performance. You don't get quality like that by designing and manufacturing
> equipment that is INTENDED TO OBSOLESCE in 18 months. It costs a lot of
> money to design gear that performs at world class levels for decades. It
> costs still more to train factory workers with the skill to build to those
> standards.
>
> My last on this.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yama Nawabi" <mknawabi.lug@gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:49 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] un-believable
>
>
>  Well, the fact that the sensor isnt as "good" as others out there
>> wouldnt stop from somone like, say me, from buying an M8. I still think
>> its the perfect camera for me. I just don't agree with how much they're
>> charging for it. I understand the M8 is hand-built and the RF mechanism
>> is expensive, but I am a firm believer that it could have been a lot
>> better under different guidance.
>>
>> I may be young, but I'm well enough versed in electronics to
>> differentiate between good and bad electronic components! The M8 has
>> been out since 2006. So has the D80. Each camera has 10.1 megapixels,
>> decent noise per ISO, but the price was very different. Now, Nikon has a
>> d90 with noise handling that exceeds other cameras, but the M8.2 has the
>> same sensor. I think when you pay such a premium, you are warranted in
>> at least a marginal sensor upgrade.
>>
>> Man. I just realized I'm talking to a bunch of people who own
>> M8s...don't be offended! Your camera is still amazing. I wish I had one
>> mself, as stated previously. I'm just comparing between then and now.
>>
>> -Yama
>>
>> PS
>> Sonny Carter wrote:
>>
>>> I usta be an expert when I was your age too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Yama Nawabi <mknawabi.lug@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Au contraire! The technology used in the M8 relative to other cameras is
>>>> rubbish. What Dante meant is that you are charging a lot for an engine
>>>> that
>>>> is old. I agree with him, but you guys can argue all you want!
>>>>
>>>> -Yama
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seth Rosner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Dante, with great respect, you utterly disqualify your comment and
>>>>> reveal
>>>>> your lack of knowledge of product by equating the Leica M8 to an
>>>>> (obsolete)
>>>>> Honda Civic. What rubbish.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seth
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dante Stella" <
>>>>> dstella1@ameritech.net
>>>>>
>>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:07 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] un-believable
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I don't even think Leica is even in the same class the US auto
>>>>>
>>>>>  industry - which has as good technology as anyone's but has been
>>>>>> struggling mightily with product mix and cost-effective production.
>>>>>> More importantly, the prices are not out of scale.  Leica, on the
>>>>>> other hand, doesn't even have the technology - and unless you believe
>>>>>> that having Germans assemble it is worth a ton of money,* the prices
>>>>>> are way out of line.  The equivalent of an M8 in the automotive world
>>>>>> would be building a 1997 Civic and selling it today for $60,000.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dante
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Assuming Solms and not Portugal does the work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:53 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I don't think it's unbelievable, I think it's hilarious for the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  cult-ish status symbol. I love Leica's products (the ones I own) but
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> also think that they, like the US auto industry, are desperate due to
>>>>>>> lack of innovation and foresight. My M4 will be working long after
>>>>>>> Leica is gone and my lenses will as well. I'm happy with that for
>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>> Phil Forrest
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1857 - Release Date:
>>>>> 12/19/2008 10:09 AM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1857 - Release Date: 12/19/2008
> 10:09 AM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)