Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] un-believable
From: mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi)
Date: Fri Dec 19 16:31:01 2008
References: <C4BF7AB3-DB7F-43A5-9A3A-62AFC042AE67@mac.com><20081219185359.04b33c1a@linux-019a.site> <0DA7A328-EA7B-486C-935A-38EB0A012C8C@ameritech.net> <BD27E035DFBE447E84496BA54E55A369@D1S9FY41>

Au contraire! The technology used in the M8 relative to other cameras is 
rubbish. What Dante meant is that you are charging a lot for an engine 
that is old. I agree with him, but you guys can argue all you want!

-Yama

Seth Rosner wrote:
> Dante, with great respect, you utterly disqualify your comment and 
> reveal your lack of knowledge of product by equating the Leica M8 to 
> an (obsolete) Honda Civic. What rubbish.
>
> Seth
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dante Stella" 
> <dstella1@ameritech.net>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] un-believable
>
>
>> I don't even think Leica is even in the same class the US auto
>> industry - which has as good technology as anyone's but has been
>> struggling mightily with product mix and cost-effective production.
>> More importantly, the prices are not out of scale.  Leica, on the
>> other hand, doesn't even have the technology - and unless you believe
>> that having Germans assemble it is worth a ton of money,* the prices
>> are way out of line.  The equivalent of an M8 in the automotive world
>> would be building a 1997 Civic and selling it today for $60,000.
>>
>> Dante
>>
>> *Assuming Solms and not Portugal does the work.
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:53 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think it's unbelievable, I think it's hilarious for the
>>> cult-ish status symbol. I love Leica's products (the ones I own) but I
>>> also think that they, like the US auto industry, are desperate due to
>>> lack of innovation and foresight. My M4 will be working long after
>>> Leica is gone and my lenses will as well. I'm happy with that for now.
>>> Phil Forrest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1857 - Release Date: 
> 12/19/2008 10:09 AM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] un-believable)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)