Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Quality (was un-believable)
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 20 08:09:05 2008
References: <C571F947.46C4F%mark@rabinergroup.com> <818DA469-3DE6-49D3-8596-E0D538DA279E@mac.com> <a3f189160812200737k6a677a81jebc064dd84f23722@mail.gmail.com> <4CEF8D73-2513-4D73-A418-0CCC02BFE54E@woh.rr.com>
3 mm doesn't feel like "much thicker" in my hands.
The M8 is, overall, smaller and lighter
than my M6TTL with new motor;
which was my main camera - pre-digital.
Differences exist - but the "feel"
is as close as one could hope for.
Still makes for the smallest
high quality kit available.
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Dec 20, 2008, at 9:46 AM, rob mcclure wrote:
> It is much thicker than film M's.
Replies:
Reply from rmcclure2 at woh.rr.com (rob mcclure) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))
Message from rmcclure2 at woh.rr.com (rob mcclure) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))