Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] was software licensing, now Leica S R strategy
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sun Oct 19 14:15:49 2008
References: <7E1467B1-6E30-400E-8254-EC9617ADA7F6@gmail.com> <B20B339D27A40AB00F97C1A7@hindolveston.reid.org> <1FBCA9D3-0174-4C62-8920-87EE11143E39@gmail.com> <F90FCA31319440D3AC13E4EB256ECCAD@dadquad> <D082A5A3-A4B0-4B72-8D0B-07AD65B2079E@cox.net> <48FA66C8.2040606@gmx.de> <E130C972-2C0A-417C-8D92-31631F148888@cox.net> <0EF92BD285F444938363B0141C3AC968@dadquad> <FE317619B84F4B3E9028B9F2713F42FD@robertbxucevjs> <C505FD27-B296-48C2-B9BC-6910E71D7F73@cox.net> <4A04B4DF09B441A8B454139F9587AFAC@dadquad> <DF85D644-7C67-40A9-AA1B-99E08B6B4E2F@cox.net> <79664918-47D6-46F6-8368-59973CD6748E@mac.com> <9278E626-3820-44FC-8D87-D64CE2633F02@cox.net>

Agreed Steve!

BTW
who and where are the next
buyers
users
advocates?
They are N or C buyers, users, and probably advocates by now.

Sometimes I wish Leica, well someone, came up with just a plain digital 
back for the R4-7, a not very elaborate thing, just a film replacement, 
full frame and clean up to ISO 600.
Better? a DMR II for the R8-9. Full frame, and that would do the trick.
I don't need to wait until they're ready to produce a state of art out 
of reach R10 in the year when I have neither DM, Shillings or Euros, nor 
teeth left either.
I'm using an L1 in the meantime; for how long before I get an N ???

Phx



Steve Barbour wrote:

>
> On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Lottermoser George wrote:
>
>> I find it difficult to understand,
>> given that you have an M8
>> current and vintage Leica lenses
>> all of which have been
>> at the top of their quality and price class,
>> how Leica strategy,
>> essentially the same as it has always been,
>> will have nothing to do with you.
>
>
> it's simply that this is their slr strategy George...(I use R's...was  
> waiting for the R digital)
>
> as it's their ultimate R plan, and includes the realistic expectation  
> that it will take a couple more years, and the end result will be 
> most  likely untouchable financially ...
>
> Steve
>
>> I can understand that,
>> if you've made the decision
>> to simply use what you have
>> for the rest of your natural life.
>> If that is the case
>> what conceivable Leica strategy
>> would feel inclusive to you?
>>
>> However, others, who have yet to decide
>> to move, seriously, into photography
>> (as we all did at some point)
>> will choose the highest quality, for their needs
>> whatever system that may mean;
>> including, possibly, Leica M, R or S systems.
>>
>> Fond regards,
>> George
>>
>> george@imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>>> But regarding equipment, as stated, I am sad that the strategy that  
>>> Leica is following will have nothing to do with me. While it may  
>>> work, it is very risky, especially in this tough international  
>>> economic climate, and it may well be a rocky road to disaster for  
>>> the company.
>>>
>>> I suspect that the S system, and quite possibly the R system too,  
>>> will be too rich for me,  perhaps for many of us...
>>>
>>> so I find it prohibitive, even nonsensical, and the world financial  
>>> realities won't help it...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] was software licensing, now Leica S R strategy)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] was software licensing, now Leica S R strategy)
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (lug) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (lug) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] software licensing question)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] was software licensing, now Leica S R strategy)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] was software licensing, now Leica S R strategy)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] was software licensing, now Leica S R strategy)