Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you very much for your comments and opinions, Jim (Nichols), Steve (Barbour), Len, Ric, George, Philippe (Phx). Now I'm more convinced about waht I thaught Saludos for all Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de Philippe AMARD Enviado el: domingo, 04 de mayo de 2008 22:11 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Which one you prefer Agreed, but both are very nice offers phx Lottermoser George wrote: > 18w works better for me. > The art trumps the maker in this case. > also > When the sculptor is in focus the also in focus stacked stools > distract from the composition. > > Fond regards, > George > george@imagist.com > www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07 > > > > On May 4, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/080318-19w.jpg.html >> http://tinyurl.com/6clcsy >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/080318-18w.jpg.html >> http://tinyurl.com/5t9jzw > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information