Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which one you prefer
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sun May 4 13:09:40 2008
References: <000801c8ae0f$c6adf1d0$2101a8c0@luispersonal> <2BCC0454-92D4-4F2F-AFA5-3044D6183EDB@mac.com>
 
Agreed, but both are very nice offers
phx


Lottermoser George wrote:

> 18w works better for me.
> The art trumps the maker in this case.
> also
> When the sculptor is in focus the also in focus stacked stools  
> distract from the composition.
>
> Fond regards,
> George
> george@imagist.com
> www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
>
>
>
> On May 4, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:
>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/080318-19w.jpg.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/6clcsy
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/080318-18w.jpg.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/5t9jzw
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Which one you prefer)
 In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Which one you prefer)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Which one you prefer)