Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I used FP3 in the early sixties if I remember correctly. Frank --- Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> wrote: > Now, now .. .I have HP4 negatives (but they go back > a few years) :) > > Never knew a HP4+ though, just the HP4 and FP4. I > forget when the "+" came > along. > > Or was it HP3? I'd have to look. > > Daniel > > On Sun, 9 May 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > Alright Alright! Typo. Maybe that's why nobody > uses it. ;-) > > > > Jeffery Smith > > New Orleans, LA > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > > > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] > On Behalf Of Paul > > Hardy Carter > > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:44 AM > > To: Leica Users Group > > Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude > > > > What is HP4+? I've heard of FP4+, and HP5+, but... > > > > P ;-) > > > > At 10:36 -0500, 9/5/04, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > >I stumbled across this web page. > > > > > >http://www.robertreeves.com/b&w.htm > > > > > >It unofficially confirms what I've notice > regarding film latitude (Pan > > >F...bad; T400CN...good). Confirms what you HP4+ > people like about that > > >film. But I don't know anyone who uses HP4+ > > > > > >Jeffery Smith > > >New Orleans, LA > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug > for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug > for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for > more information