Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude
From: daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon May 10 05:06:11 2004
References: <000c01c435ee$c5497230$7e6b0e44@newukolbqveo9i>

Now, now .. .I have HP4 negatives (but they go back a few years) :)

Never knew a HP4+ though, just the HP4 and FP4. I forget when the "+" came
along.

Or was it HP3? I'd have to look.

Daniel

On Sun, 9 May 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> Alright Alright! Typo. Maybe that's why nobody uses it. ;-)
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> Hardy Carter
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:44 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude
>
> What is HP4+? I've heard of FP4+, and HP5+, but...
>
> P ;-)
>
> At 10:36 -0500, 9/5/04, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> >I stumbled across this web page.
> >
> >http://www.robertreeves.com/b&w.htm
> >
> >It unofficially confirms what I've notice regarding film latitude (Pan
> >F...bad; T400CN...good). Confirms what you HP4+ people like about that
> >film. But I don't know anyone who uses HP4+
> >
> >Jeffery Smith
> >New Orleans, LA
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] B&W Film Latitude)
Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] B&W Film Latitude)
In reply to: Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] B&W Film Latitude)