Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Okay, okay, I screwed up. It's HP5+. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Ridings Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 7:04 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude Now, now .. .I have HP4 negatives (but they go back a few years) :) Never knew a HP4+ though, just the HP4 and FP4. I forget when the "+" came along. Or was it HP3? I'd have to look. Daniel On Sun, 9 May 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote: > Alright Alright! Typo. Maybe that's why nobody uses it. ;-) > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Paul > Hardy Carter > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:44 AM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude > > What is HP4+? I've heard of FP4+, and HP5+, but... > > P ;-) > > At 10:36 -0500, 9/5/04, Jeffery Smith wrote: > >I stumbled across this web page. > > > >http://www.robertreeves.com/b&w.htm > > > >It unofficially confirms what I've notice regarding film latitude (Pan > >F...bad; T400CN...good). Confirms what you HP4+ people like about that > >film. But I don't know anyone who uses HP4+ > > > >Jeffery Smith > >New Orleans, LA > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information