Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3
From: Rich Lahrson <tripspud@wenet.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:41:09 -0700
References: <3.0.6.32.20000815092618.009289a0@pop.microtec.net> <39997ED0.41616B37@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <3999EB91.40D5A497@primus.com.au> <00db01c00725$d664f9a0$0100000a@loksi> <399B3B18.D5DDF47D@primus.com.au> <3.0.6.32.20000816230925.00943100@pop.microtec.net>
 
Dan Cardish wrote:
> One reason for not spending that kind of money on the S3 is that it is a
> one of kind offering...Nikon in making no indications that they will
> provide more than the token 50mm lens for this camera...................

Hi Dan,

     I wonder if the used market on S Nikon lenses will skyrocket; perhaps
most of the buyers of the 'new' S3 only want the camera?

				Cheers,
	
							Rich Lahrson
							tripspud@wenet.net
In reply to: Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3)
Message from "A.H.SCHMIDT" <horsts@primus.com.au> (Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3)
Message from "Ross McLeish" <loksi@dingoblue.net.au> (Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3)
Message from "A.H.SCHMIDT" <horsts@primus.com.au> (Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] On the Nikon S3)