Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Faux Leica
From: john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster)
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 10:50:21 +0000
References: <CADjf=X+3-p9jo31gL_mnrpo0am6cB8Qt__xR1-6g_7XyzuJRkA@mail.gmail.com>
 
I find mine varies with system and where I am. 35mm film was 28mm or 35mm, 
M9 onwards was 50mm, Hasselblad film was 38mm or 150mm and with the Leica S 
it is the 120mm (96mm equiv).....

john

?On 09/03/2024, 04:36, "LUG on behalf of Alan Magayne-Roshak via LUG" 
<lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.uk at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at 
leica-users.org> wrote:

    The throngs won't have to compete with me.  I couldn't abide a fixed 35mm
    (equiv)
    lens.  I have a 50mm (80mm equiv) on my X-E2 90% of the time, as my 
normal
    lens.
    I find 35mm way too wide.   :^)
    -- 
    Alan
In reply to: Message from amagayneroshak at gmail.com (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Faux Leica)