Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M3 have a couple spares
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 22:05:36 -0800
References: <CADjf=XKKTpLTJb5fzfUZNduDNfY9FAZemnJHrGXBWyivcXF4pg@mail.gmail.com>

M3 DS EX M3 SS both chrome also beat up but red dot cla 2023 M4-2 and MDa  
will note on Friday  

> On Mar 6, 2024, at 9:16 PM, Alan Magayne-Roshak via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 Frank Filippone <bmwred735i at gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Part of being in a cult is to accept all things cult..... and for Leica,
>> that means NOTHING is better than an M3.? If it does not look like an M3
>> (M5) it is no good.? If it has one dimension different than an M3 (M240)
>> it is no good.? If it does not use a 24x36 sensor (M8) it is no good.
> 
>> II just read about the newest member of the team of no good
>> Leicas....M11.? Why? Because it does not have a removable base
>> plate.....? Like the M3.
> ===================================================================
> For ME, the M3 was the best Leica ever, since I like the 50/90/135
> viewfinder, and it's the
> only one that has it. (I know I'm in the tiniest minority.  :^)
> -- 
> Alan
> 
> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Photo Services
> (Retired)
> UPAA Photographer of the Year 1978
> UPAA Master of the Profession 2014
> amagayneroshak at gmail.com
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/>
> 
> "All the technique in the world doesn't compensate
> for an inability to notice. " - Elliott Erwitt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from amagayneroshak at gmail.com (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))