Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 Frank Filippone <bmwred735i at gmail.com>wrote: >Part of being in a cult is to accept all things cult..... and for Leica, >that means NOTHING is better than an M3.? If it does not look like an M3 >(M5) it is no good.? If it has one dimension different than an M3 (M240) >it is no good.? If it does not use a 24x36 sensor (M8) it is no good. >II just read about the newest member of the team of no good >Leicas....M11.? Why? Because it does not have a removable base >plate.....? Like the M3. =================================================================== For ME, the M3 was the best Leica ever, since I like the 50/90/135 viewfinder, and it's the only one that has it. (I know I'm in the tiniest minority. :^) -- Alan Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Photo Services (Retired) UPAA Photographer of the Year 1978 UPAA Master of the Profession 2014 amagayneroshak at gmail.com <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/> "All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for an inability to notice. " - Elliott Erwitt