Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses sample images
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:59:07 -0800
References: <d2120601-b6fa-4538-907b-a7755874603c@iol.ie> <D9395AAC-19C1-4F8C-B84C-19EAAC81AD0F@teleport.com> <99A12659-4B55-4E77-A33C-AEA97B173AAD@mac.com> <CBA22895-D7E5-46AE-BCE1-F22629CE4A7E@mcmaster.co.uk> <6daa4519-e557-4a41-889b-f4c2ef55acb5@gmail.com>
In reply to:
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Faux Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
Message from rclompus at mac.com (Richard Clompus) ([Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses)
Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses)