Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/05/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Closed Parc - Don
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:12:55 +0100
References: <362273F5-6E50-49D1-887D-1102AD92B29C@gmail.com> <CA+3n+_nHgN-BJ83bwVez1Pb_LhdUduvU==w_yUdzC5hE0p9wYA@mail.gmail.com> <4CA85CF3-CB60-47B2-B779-87A6F17572C3@gmail.com> <CA+3n+_koQ+Nw3k=iheRhsJ=+m19e-s2oSh1FFTRMvpJKamJ5=A@mail.gmail.com> <93AD899D-0B44-48C8-B24D-512D5DAE35CF@gmail.com>

Is that your own very fancy Hassy drone, Philippe?


On 13/05/2020 12:38, Philippe via LUG wrote:
> Parks, and Parks :-)
>
> Barcelons is known to have wild-boars around.
> https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/bombers/en/noticia/watch-out-for-wild-boars_360417
>
> Closing the gates prevents them from investing the nearly deserted places 
> and spreading hepatitis through the community on top of COVID19, mostly to 
> the kids playing in these parks.
>
> That might another of the reasons why. But who am I to guess ?
>
> Amities
>
> Philippe, semi-confined and surrounded by wild-boars, cf infra  :-)
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Metz/DJI_0220.jpg.html?g2_fromNavId=xe8847acf
>
>
>
>
>> Le 12 mai 2020 ? 22:54, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> a ?crit 
>> :
>>
>> HI, Phillipe.  My comments about US parks was more to reinforce the
>> stupidity of some government officials.  My daughter had reservations for 
>> a
>> camping spot in a Washington State park.  Reservations mean you don't get
>> in the park without one.  Limited number of folks in the huge park.  Yet
>> her reservation was cancelled, the park rangers couldn't cruise around the
>> park ensuring that the rules were followed?  What the F&%k are the state
>> employees doing with nobody allowed in the park.  Moving the conversation
>> to Spain, once the stay in your home orders had been modified so different
>> age groups could go outside at different times with restrictions the
>> gendarmes could not keep a watch on the park to ensure that the rules were
>> followed?  If we are going to have limited stay at home restrictions then
>> ensuring the sanity of the public is of great importance to all involved.
>> Letting people within reason enjoy a park helps to keep the populations
>> sanity: if the population can't follow the rules then you close the park 
>> or
>> whatever public space is in question with the explanation that some could
>> not keep the rest of the citizens safe.
>>
>> The various countries of course are free to set whatever policies that 
>> make
>> sense for them.  Scenario 1 is that we have various forms of lockdowns
>> until 50% or more of the population is vaccinated whenever a vaccine is
>> created.  Managing the sanity of the citizens will be a careful balancing
>> of limited freedoms carefully managed so that exposure to the virus is as
>> low as possible.  In this scenario government finances are stretched to 
>> the
>> limit as there is no income coming in.  Some organizations close forever 
>> as
>> resources evaporate(workforce that choose not to be locked up, commitments
>> for inputs that go to who can actually purchase the inputs and lock up 
>> said
>> resources).
>>
>> Scenario 2 is to start to open up your society as much as possible 
>> watching
>> hospital resources carefully: the goal is to get as many people with
>> antibodies as possible without overloading the medical resources
>> available.  Here you will shut things down progressively if your medical
>> resources begin to overload.  In this scenario deaths may increase
>> dramatically if wrong calls are made.
>>
>> Scenario 3 is the German model that allowed companies to remain open with
>> strict monitoring of worker conditions to limit the spread of the virus.
>> Social distancing is strongly enforced.  This is a middle path with
>> possibly a middle mortality rate but incomes to the government are less
>> affected.
>>
>> Scenario 4 is large testing with police enforcement of quarantine as 
>> people
>> are found to be infected.  This only works in small population countries
>> with a strong social bond that trusts/obey authority.  It also only works
>> when the infection is just starting and the infected are a relatively 
>> small
>> number.  This would never work in Paris or NYC currently as too many are
>> infected to trace the infections.
>>
>> Scenario 5 is the Swedish model.  Essentially a variation on the German
>> model with more choice by the citizens.  Currently a higher mortality rate
>> than the nearest neighbors but maybe smarter if a vaccine is not developed
>> in 6-18 months.
>>
>> In the US we are essentially trying 1 and 2 simultaneously.  States like
>> Georgia, Florida, Texas, Colorado, S. Dakota are working on #2.  NY,
>> Washington State, Michigan, Pennsylvania appear to be trying #1.  The next
>> few weeks will be enlightening.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:43 PM Philippe via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A tragedy yes.
>>>
>>> Now, the rest of your reasonings is open to questions. Different places,
>>> cultures, etc. Lluis's downtown parc is not a National Park in the US, 
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> Same virus though. Lethal for humans.
>>>
>>> And all the more so if you drink bleach instead of cerve?a ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Amities
>>>
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Le 12 mai 2020 ? 21:33, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> a 
>>>> ?crit :
>>>>
>>>> That is a tragedy.  Sunlight and fresh air kill the virus.  People just
>>>> need to keep their distance and/or wear a mask.  Several of our states
>>> have
>>>> closed their state parks for fear that people won't follow the rules.  
>>>> If
>>>> someone won't follow the rules in 10,000 hectares of forest they won't
>>>> follow them walking down the street.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:57 PM Lluis Ripoll via LUG <
>>> lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A Parc in confinement?.
>>>>> <
>>>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Abstracts/20200512_L1020708.jpg.html
>>>>> Leica Monochrom (CCCD), Noctilux F1.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome
>>>>>
>>>>> Saludos cordiales
>>>>> Lluis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Don
>>>> don.dory at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Don
>> don.dory at gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Closed Parc - Don)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Closed Parc)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Closed Parc)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Closed Parc - Don)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Closed Parc - Don)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Closed Parc - Don)