[Leica] Comparing portraits with Noctilux Monochrom and film

[tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley)]

I agree with Howard.

Tina

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:09 PM Howard L Ritter Jr via LUG <
lug at leica-users.org> wrote:

> Lluis, I have just the opposite reaction. i think the MM image is superior
> in just about every way. To me, the film image looks like a flat image that
> has been recorded on a flat surface, like I?m looking at a piece of film,
> while the MM image has smoothness, richness of dynamic range, contrast, and
> depth, like I?m looking through it into reality.
>
> Of course, this impression has nothing to do with the fact that I love my
> own MM?
>
> ?howard
>
> > On Feb 24, 2020, at 7:44 PM, Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at 
> > leica-users.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > These ones are with Leica MP, Noctilux wide open, film Ilford HP5 rated
> at nominal ISO 400, developed with D23  1:1
> >
> > Diana (3)
> > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Portraits/2020F020209.jpg.html>
> >
> > Diana (4)
> > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Portraits/2020F020211.jpg.html>
> >
> > Please compare Diana (4) with this one Diana (1) with the Leica
> Monochrom CCD, Noctilux f1 wide open, at ISO 1600
> >
> > <
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Portraits/20200213_L1020137.jpg.html
> >
> >
> > I think that film?s structure or texture gives despite a very small
> grain, more relief to the portrait, it looks to me more alive?. What do you
> think?
> >
> > Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome
> >
> > Saludos cordiales
> > Lluis
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



-- 
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley
<http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html>