Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Monday Misc.
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 01:40:27 +0100
References: <CA+3n+_k9a335Pt2gjPEmVS_h0k_bRhSJs_gbcxvz+nQh9AZsGA@mail.gmail.com> <D83D78B3-8067-4891-8BBE-3CFAB5687FD9@gmail.com> <CA+3n+_=J-Fd-_O72k8yc4ODGNhJP67F8GFTovZ8MXe0B3QCGkQ@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you Don for the information, my friend who has  bought this lens live 
in Belgium, I will meet him next April and ask, also I will see and test the 
lens, we keep in touch.

Cheers
Lluis


> El 22 febr 2020, a les 0:08, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> va 
> escriure:
> 
> Thank you for your comments.  There are some blown highlights on the
> projected man, the glare on his glasses.   The top of his pate is just
> under blown as it reads about 98, 98, 98 on the histogram.
> 
> I have had this lens for a few years, I bought it with my Noctilux and a
> 57mm F1.2 Konica.  I have compared it to two generations of the Canon 50
> 1.2.  There old double gauss designs get very interesting when pushed to
> F1.2 and beyond.
> 
> If your friend has a converted mount version it will be very enjoyable.
> If still the old external bayonet then using it on a Canon 7(s) is not
> fast from an M experience.   My version is a converted TV lens: it is
> easier to convert a C mount to M.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 4:58 PM Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Great Don! I like very much this style of shots, another friend of mine
>> has just bought one and I find it is a very interesting lens and less
>> expensive than a Noctilux, the highlights on the two first pictures look
>> overexposed on my monitor, it is a shame?, I?m sure you will do a great 
>> use
>> of this lens and I?m very interested tpo follow your experience with it,
>> congrats!
>> Lluis
>> 
>> 
>>> El 17 febr 2020, a les 14:03, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> 
>>> va
>> escriure:
>>> 
>>> Greetings to all.  This weeks images are mostly to display how the Canon
>>> 0.95 lens displays images.  So first up is a more typical rendering from
>>> this 60's lens.  If you miss focus at all then you get haloing and
>> softness:
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/perplexed+man.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> However, if you nail the focus you get a pretty good image, finer detail
>>> isn't there as on modern lenses but still quite acceptable:
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/different+reactions+to+Cybermen+lecture.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> Even near edge regions of focus render pretty well; there is some field
>>> curvature but on cameras that let you focus off center that doesn't
>>> present any problems:
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Monday+Misc/torn+jeans.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> all the best.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Don
>>> don.dory at gmail.com
>>> --
>>> Don
>>> don.dory at gmail.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Monday Misc.)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Monday Misc.)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Monday Misc.)