Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm with SonC on this. No iPhone prints yet but I'm out of Leicas and they are probably not coming back. (Famous last words, I know.) --Bob On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:37 AM Sonny Carter via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > My iPhone cost $1000 or so, which is more than some Leica branded cameras > go for. I can run Photoshop on my phone, and post to my web-site or > Facebook, or share with someone in moments. > > The quality, if I'm careful and use my knowledge, with some post-production > is as high as you might need, given the limits of Blurb's reproduction > quality. > > I've blown some up to 16x20, and they hold up nicely on the wall. > > If you limit the book to Leica cameras or Leica Glass, then I'm afraid I'll > be out of the deal, because I rarely bother to hitch my few Leica lenses to > my Sony anymore. > > > > > Regards, > > Sonny > http://sonc.com/look/ > Natchitoches, Louisiana > 1714 > Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase > > USA > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:51 AM Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> > wrote: > > > IMHO, I think that we should stick to the format as it was last time, > > i.e. photographs taken "in the spirit of" Leica, but with whatever we > > are using, Leica , Fuji, Sony, Nikon, etc etc. Perhaps, but only if all > > agree, no phone shots (not they can't be very good, but...). > > > > Maybe the title should be "The Spirit of Leica"? > > > > If we want to fill in "the gaps" how about a special part of the web > > site as an exhibit. A book to cover the missing years would take too > > long and be too large. > > > > Peter > > > > PS Sorry Gerry, but I disagree. I think (say) Leica glass on a Fuji X > > should be acceptable. > > > > On 22/09/2019 04:58, Dan Khong via LUG wrote: > > > Friends > > > > > > I have been thinking about the 2019 LUG Year Book. As we all know, > there > > > are three missing years between the last Year Book in 2015 and this > > coming > > > one. Perhaps one could look at this one as a special revival Year Book. > > > There can be two possibilities: > > > > > > Scenario 1: Have a Year Book that calls for two pictures taken in 2019. > > > > > > Scenario 2: Although the aim is to capture photos taken in 2019, I > > wonder > > > if this "Revived LUG Year Book" 2019 edition can also accept one photo > > from > > > the missing years and the customary images taken in 2019 - but still > > > limited to the customary maximum of two pictures. This can encourage > more > > > responses without Uncle Ted needing to stretch his vocal cords to get > > > people jumping out of their seats. > > > > > > Just sharing my thoughts about this. Of course Brian will be holding > the > > > mike and have the final say. > > > > > > Happy snaps. > > > > > > Dan K. > > > Singapore > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > -- > > > > Dr. Peter Dzwig > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >