Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] observation about LUG message traffic
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:03:16 +0100
References: <83248f2e4f4cce647cd272d75dfa19c4@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <B43FF2F9-2B00-4B0D-A32B-1601A0EF95BB@gmail.com>

I'm guilty of thanking to the list, but will now change my ways and do 
it back channel.

Douglas
who is up to his eyes at the moment and has no time to comment let alone 
post

On 10/09/2019 00:50, CartersXRd via LUG wrote:
> I?m with brian, the best way to say thank you is to comment on someone 
> else?s photo
>
> ric
>
>
>> On Sep 9, 2019, at 2:47 PM, Brian Reid <reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I counted. About 1/4 to 1/5 of the traffic on the LUG is messages 
>> thanking people for making comments on pictures. I think we are all being 
>> too polite. Maybe it would be better to send these by private email and 
>> not to the whole group.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] observation about LUG message traffic)
In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] observation about LUG message traffic)
Message from cartersxrd at gmail.com (CartersXRd) ([Leica] observation about LUG message traffic)