Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/03/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Q2 just out
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 05:51:35 -0600
References: <93638765-4860-4759-B3FE-D374CA19DF65@rabinergroup.com> <777ebba1-ed45-48de-d775-a2850c9c2844@summaventures.com> <CAFfkXxsEyTN7cYwvUTZLARV_YjDyaRHjtWPBhZXaXGaNO=6qpw@mail.gmail.com>

I'm guessing that with a 50 Summilux going for 3k then a Leica body and a
couple of lenses for 5k is not so bad a deal; especially if you haven't
upgraded bodies in a while.  With high resolution sensors fewer lenses and
more cropping may be the ticket to less weight on the shoulder.  If Leica
ever put out a Q2t with a 50 then two bodies could serve most needs pretty
well.

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 5:25 AM Sonny Carter via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 3:55 AM Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can't honestly say I'm impressed. I like the size and the resolution
> > increase and the Q was and is an interesting camera.
> >
> > I'd like to see better test images. Does anyone really pay $5k to take
> > pictures of corgis and second-rate street scenes?
> >
> > Peter
>
>
> I?m guessing the answer to that is affirmative.  I?m guessing some pay
> quite a few more pennies, though I?m guessing the most famous corgi shooter
> gets her Leicas as product placement.  :-)
>
> >
> > On 08/03/2019 22:40, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> > > I've run into a few articles on the Q2 last night the just out upgrade
> > from the just plain Q only this one not just full frame but also way high
> > rez. 47MP's! The Sony has had the compact high rez full frame out a few
> > years now not sure if people buy it or like me just dream about it. It's
> > seems pocketable. The Leica not pocketable.
> > > Looking at it this morning with more news sources weighing in it seems
> > like an M with a 28 1.7 lens stuck to it for five grand American money.
> It
> > does not seem all that much smaller or lighter than a M in which you
> could
> > put compact glass on the front of it or a Noctilux. So this is a bad
> > review. I?m not all that hot on the not compact or cheap enough newest
> > camera from Leica. I think they should stop putting fast monster lenses
> on
> > compact cameras making them no longer compact or light weight cameras. Or
> > cheap.
> > >
> > >  https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/leica-q2-first-impressions-review
> > >
> > > None of the reviews I read addess if low light preformace is made worse
> > buy the ultra high rez increase.  As if they really held the camera in
> > their hands.
> > > Also they're calling it a Summilux and it?s a f1.7. Sad.
> > > To me its like the "one inch sensor" thing.. A misdirect. Leicas doing
> > well they don't need to lie.
> > > A digital lie is still a lie.
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Dr. Peter Dzwig
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://sonc.com/look/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> 1714
> Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Don
don.dory at gmail.com


Replies: Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Leica Q2 just out)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica Q2 just out)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Leica Q2 just out)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Leica Q2 just out)