Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 28mm f1.4 7Artisans M
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:03:18 -0800
References: <CABXy407+AmvHB7bNf3RZn=Tszi3KvhG+=UGUgijZ-7-4TkSyFg@mail.gmail.com> <0814612F-80A3-4EEC-AB39-A8536954A691@teleport.com>

I head don at Shawdosmith has one I think he is a dealer as well he reports 
it is superb

shadowsmithphotographics at gmail.com



> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:46 PM, Mark Kronquist via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> Why not Leica r elmarit. Just bought one for $250. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.org> wrote:
>> 
>> So I have a bit of a dilemma.
>> 
>> Having recently acquired an SL with Summilux 50, I wanted to add a compact
>> wide-angle lens, for snapshots and even casual portraits.
>> 
>> But then, I quickly came to realize that the price of a Q is quite
>> comparable to the price of a Summicron-M 28mm.
>> 
>> It's almost as if I get a free body if I buy a Q.
>> 
>> I will soon get a 24-90 SL, but there are times I want to carry a compact
>> snap shooter. I can continue to use my Olympus Pen F with Pana/Leica 15mm
>> for this purpose, but the Leica image quality does have addictive 
>> qualities.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ken Iisaka
>> first name at last name dot org or com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Q or a Summicron 28mm with SL?)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Q or a Summicron 28mm with SL?)