Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/05/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] SL redux, end of story (another view of the A7Riii)
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler)
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 12:10:31 -0700
References: <1633c12af19-17a2-4058@webjas-vae228.srv.aolmail.net> <CAFfkXxt_JEegmn0CMUnSCkesKyi4uwfv4=Ck4QhpSJhwcUh60Q@mail.gmail.com> <3FFF9B30-E1A8-4ADC-8767-018CF6D9E65C@mac.com>

Had my A7r II modified for WA M-lenses. Wonderful work. Same folks modify
for Mono or IR I believe. Kolarivision. You'll do well with them in my
experience.


Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com
*"Capturing Light One Frame At A Time"*

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Adam Bridge via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
wrote:

> Just another perspective on the Sony A7 series.
>
> I?ve been using these cameras, or E-mount variants since the NEX-7.
>
> I?d just like to make an observation about E-mount nomenclature: Sony
> makes a difference between an E-mount and FE-mount lenses, the latter being
> for full-frame cameras while the former is for APS-C varieties. I just
> looked at my Sony lenses and while they are marked ?E-mount? they also
> carry (for example) FE 28-70 f? nomenclature showing they are full-frame
> compatible. If you mount a non-FE lens on a full frame camera the camera
> automatically produces APS-C sized images even in RAW.
>
> There is a subtle but real difference between the A7Rii and the A7Riii. I
> took both with me to China. In every case I always reached for the iii
> first. There are two reasons, the biggest being the battery. Perhaps the
> most limiting problem for the A7 cameras up to this most recent vintage
> (A9, A7Riii, A7iii) has been battery life. The new batteries are vastly
> superior and give, in my experience, an all-day carry around shooting
> experience. The previous generations hardly lasted a half-day.
>
> The new A7Riii has the pixel shift technology. I haven?t tried it but I?m
> betting that it requires a seriously heavy-duty tripod to work.
>
> Autofocus for the new cameras is better than the old.
>
> And I find myself wondering: why the hell am I using autofocus? This past
> weekend I was in Boulder and Rocky Mountain National Park. I took one of
> the Zeiss Loxia 35mm F2.0 lenses which is entirely manual focus. Mounted
> the on the A7 cameras it?s the same size as a Leica 35mm f2.0 summicron
> (with adaptor). I loved it. Adding autofocus just adds weight and SIZE. I
> find I always am making focus modifications so manual focus isn?t slower.
> AND there is a very nice magnifying focus aid built into the Sony cameras
> to really nail down focus.
>
> Yes, the menu system isn?t nearly as nice as the Leica or Fuji systems.
> Yes, there are too many added frilly things that Sony just seems to need to
> add to their cameras. Does a pro camera really need a ?Toy? setting????
>
> I?m seriously thinking of having my A7Rii converted to monochrome. If
> anyone out there has done this, or has friends with experience please let
> me know.
>
> Hope this was in some way helpful.
>
> Adam Bridge
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] SL redux, end of story (another view of the A7Riii))
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] SL redux, end of story)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] SL redux, end of story)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] SL redux, end of story (another view of the A7Riii))