Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Highlands PAW 16
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:18:45 -0400
References: <MMXP12301MB15027720009709F9CA93EEE3F98F0@MMXP12301MB1502.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

I find variations on a shower to be very interesting; the third one with
the vertical line perhaps works best for me although the more ambiguous
second one also works for me.  The two with the darker line are perhaps not
ambiguous enough to work for me; perhaps it is the contrast of the dark to
the light that make it less interesting.  I will have to come back in a
while and look again to see if first glance opinions are the same.  Thanks
for posting.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:20 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> 
wrote:

> Two sets this week; variations on a shower and 'where'd it go'.  Latter
> are not technically the best, the S was closest camera and handholding a
> 120mm at 1/25th while shooting a moving cat...
>
> http://johnmcmaster.com/PAW/2018/16
>
> C & C welcome
>
> john
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Don
don.dory at gmail.com


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Highlands PAW 16)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Highlands PAW 16)