Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro
From: craig at craigschroeder.com (Craig Schroeder)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:14:38 -0600
References: <80B580C9-6D99-482F-98AC-67B97E6A0B47@f3documentaryphotography.com> <LOXP123MB1112FEFB6DD0176E0546E9E6F9CE0@LOXP123MB1112.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CABXy4063p1LqPkO6mxcCtLTocmXbVRwEheKbGcDFA7JCnf=CcA@mail.gmail.com> <LOXP123MB1112735FA186F7670F6B1788F9CE0@LOXP123MB1112.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

I'm chiming in because I discovered something by accident... First of 
all, my favorite versatile bag is the Filson Magnum as it collapses on 
itself nicely for lighter loadings but can hold an amazing amount when 
needed.? I had purchased a Hadley Digital as a small bag for another 
duty but have found that I can carry an amazing amount in it.? It holds 
an M w/35 attached, a 90, 50 and 25 Color Skopar w/finder.? The front 
pocket holds an SF-20 flash, extra batteries, film, etc.? All the lenses 
are in pouches, too. I've found that I actually prefer the more flexible 
waterproof canvas (FiberNyte) to the heavier material in the other 
Billinghams that I've had.? I would never have thought the Digital model 
would hold so much and wouldn't have considered it for what I'm actually 
using it for.? To look at it, one wouldn't ever guess it could hold a 
body, 4 lenses, flash and the rest.

http://tinyurl.com/yckja7d6

On 2/21/2018 11:47 AM, John McMaster wrote:
> I have used Billingham's for nearly 40 years ;-)  Still got an original 1 
> and 3, although neither gets much use these days as too large for M kit 
> (use a Filson Magnum for the S kit).
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Iisaka
>
> I've been using Billingham bags for twenty years, starting with a 335, 
> then Alice, and recently added a Hadley Pro. The Hadley is used as a way 
> to carry the gear on flights to the destination. I pack an Alice or Hadley 
> Pro in my suitcase for carrying the minimum for roaming around. I've 
> packed a Nikonos underwater kit with a strobe and two lenses in the 335, 
> but also have travelled light with just a body and a couple of lenses in 
> Alice.
>
> I can also pack a laptop computer (or two) in the 335 and Hadley Pro, so, 
> they are sometimes the only camera bag I use on trips. Alice is still 
> great for one body and up to three lenses, but not much more. It's a day 
> bag.
>
> In addition, I use my Hadley Pro as my commute bag to work, where I pack 
> my laptop and usually not much else.
>
> I just bought a Hadley Small for my son's girlfriend for a 10-day trip to 
> Japan to carry her Olympus camera and stuff. It's her everyday bag now. We 
> jokingly call it the Richard Hammond bag, because Richard Hammond of the 
> Top Gear / Grand Tour fame has been seen with one on shows.
>
>
> On 21 February 2018 at 04:21, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I like the A&A stuff for the M kit, bags are designed for that size
>> camera/lens rather than SLRs.  I have the ACAM 1000 which can hold two
>> bodies and up to six lenses....
>>
>> http://www.artisan-n-artist.com/product.php?nid=5
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.uk at leica-users.org] On
>> Behalf Of Frank Farmer
>> Sent: 21 February 2018 04:12
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: [Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro
>>
>> Team,
>>
>> I?ve been a Domke user for about a billion years. So, there?s that. In
>> SLR land, I carried two F-2 bags: one for bodies and lenses, one for
>> lights and remotes. In Leica M land, I always carried, and still do, a
>> well-worn F-6 (the ?little bit smaller bag?). The problem is just
>> that, though: it?s well-worn. While is has many more miles on it, for
>> sure, I?d like to have something not so worn for those times when such
>> isn?t exactly the best option.
>>
>> I?m enticed by the Billingham Hadley Pro. I?ve been flummoxed, though,
>> in my efforts to actually put my hands on one. New Orleans? No dice. DC? 
>> Same.
>> Jackson? You?ve lost your mind.  I?m limited to my experience with
>> various photos from the likes of the Billingham website and B&H, etc.
>>
>> Here?s my query: Has anyone moved from a thicker bag like a Domke (the
>> four compartment insert is a thing of beauty because one can always
>> access each compartment) to a more slimline bag like the Billingham?
>> How did it change your shooting style? Your storage style? Access? It
>> appears that equipment will take more digging to access in the B?ham,
>> for example. Is the experience more vertical?
>>
>> For reference, my current usual M kit consists of an M10, 35, 50, 90,
>> flash w/ diffuser, and the normal accessories (extra battery, memory
>> cards, lens cloth, pen, flashlight, glucose monitor (ok, fine, that?s
>> not a normal piece of kit, and Leica doesn?t make one, but I have to 
>> carry one anyway).
>> Sometimes, there is a super-wide with finder.
>>
>> Thoughts? Anyone made that exact swap?
>>
>> Here?s to my second totally subjective question in a week. Thanks for
>> sharing your experiences.
>>
>> Frank F. Farmer
>> Jackson, Mississippi
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
-- 



In reply to: Message from frank at f3documentaryphotography.com (Frank Farmer) ([Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro)