Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:19:11 +0200
References: <80B580C9-6D99-482F-98AC-67B97E6A0B47@f3documentaryphotography.com>

My totally subjective answer is that although I own Billingham and Domke 
(and other) bags, I think that I have recently hit jackpot with the Gitzo:

https://www.shutterbug.com/content/gitzo-century-compact-camera-messenger-bag-review

The outfit I am carrying in it right now in Sofia, Bulgaria (my first trip 
with this bag) is a Fuji with a lens mounted plus 4 other lenses. It should 
certainly be sufficient to accommodate the Leica outfit you describe. 

It is the best compromise between size, protection and convenience that I 
have encountered so far in my eternal quest for the perfect bag.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 21 Feb 2018, at 06:12, Frank Farmer <frank at 
> f3documentaryphotography.com> wrote:
> 
> Team,
> 
> I?ve been a Domke user for about a billion years. So, there?s that. In SLR 
> land, I carried two F-2 bags: one for bodies and lenses, one for lights 
> and remotes. In Leica M land, I always carried, and still do, a well-worn 
> F-6 (the ?little bit smaller bag?). The problem is just that, though: it?s 
> well-worn. While is has many more miles on it, for sure, I?d like to have 
> something not so worn for those times when such isn?t exactly the best 
> option. 
> 
> I?m enticed by the Billingham Hadley Pro. I?ve been flummoxed, though, in 
> my efforts to actually put my hands on one. New Orleans? No dice. DC? 
> Same. Jackson? You?ve lost your mind.  I?m limited to my experience with 
> various photos from the likes of the Billingham website and B&H, etc.
> 
> Here?s my query: Has anyone moved from a thicker bag like a Domke (the 
> four compartment insert is a thing of beauty because one can always access 
> each compartment) to a more slimline bag like the Billingham? How did it 
> change your shooting style? Your storage style? Access? It appears that 
> equipment will take more digging to access in the B?ham, for example. Is 
> the experience more vertical? 
> 
> For reference, my current usual M kit consists of an M10, 35, 50, 90, 
> flash w/ diffuser, and the normal accessories (extra battery, memory 
> cards, lens cloth, pen, flashlight, glucose monitor (ok, fine, that?s not 
> a normal piece of kit, and Leica doesn?t make one, but I have to carry one 
> anyway). Sometimes, there is a super-wide with finder.
> 
> Thoughts? Anyone made that exact swap?
> 
> Here?s to my second totally subjective question in a week. Thanks for 
> sharing your experiences. 
> 
> Frank F. Farmer
> Jackson, Mississippi 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from frank at f3documentaryphotography.com (Frank Farmer) ([Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro)