Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fwd: IMG: One Last Photobomber Image
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:07:40 -0700
References: <d7a49e4d-0a7a-3a80-0c66-16805b08205c@lighttube.net> <b6719d09-8709-2948-58f9-3ad7c4cb3a91@lighttube.net> <001a01d2f5d8$319eafb0$94dc0f10$@ca> <3c151f7e-de8b-9300-dfd0-360ffbb3f6a8@lighttube.net>

Jeeessshhh when you can't at first look? See him? I figure stick with the
BIG WATER BOMBER?"  :-) 
AAAAAHHHHHHH But The P51 Mustang is a plane and a half all on it's own! I'd
fly one of those everyday if I had one!LOVE IT! :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
Of
Jim Nichols
Sent: July-05-17 2:54 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Fwd: IMG: One Last Photobomber Image

Hi Ted,

I see you are still infatuated with the P-51. :-)

A knowledgeable viewer on another list says mine is a mosquito. I seem 
to recall slapping one on my hand, and I do have an itchy spot.  I think 
his ID is reasonable, but I don't expect to make a habit of 
photographing such tiny subjects. :-)

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 7/5/2017 4:46 PM, Ted Grant wrote:
> How about a P51 Mustang taking on a
> "SUPER FORTRESS???"  :-)
> ted  :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On 
> Behalf
Of
> Jim Nichols
> Sent: July-05-17 12:00 PM
> To: LUG at Leica-Users.org; Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: [Leica] Fwd: IMG: One Last Photobomber Image
>
> A link would have been helpful.
>
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20170704-DSCF2723-2.JPG.html
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:      IMG: One Last Photobomber Image
> Date:         Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:55:36 -0500
> From:         Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
> To:   LUG at Leica-Users.org <lug at leica-users.org>, Olympus Camera
> Discussion <olympus at thomasclausen.net>
>
>
>
> Challenged by Alan's image, I spent some time trying to get more detail
> in the "bomber" image.  So far as I can make out, the wing span is about
> fifty per cent larger than the Skipper's eye, which I would estimate to
> be about 3/32 of an inch.  Hence, the small insect has a span slightly
> larger than 1/8 inch.  No wonder I failed to notice him.
>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: One Last Photobomber Image)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Fwd: IMG: One Last Photobomber Image)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Fwd: IMG: One Last Photobomber Image)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Fwd: IMG: One Last Photobomber Image)