[Leica] Film vs... digital? Why are we still having this debate?

[richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)]

True, but it seems to have "migrated" ;-)

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Richard the original topic was actually about Lluis wanting to print for
> exhibition from scans and digital originals to look very similar in his
> large exhibition prints
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 at 7:16 am, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:
>
> > One painter uses acrylics, another oils. What's the difference?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Man
> > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 4:13 PM
> > To: Leica Users Group
> > Subject: [Leica] Film vs... digital? Why are we still having this debate?
> >
> > I shot 130+ sheets of 4x5 portra in 2 long weekends a couple weeks ago.
> >
> > Film is for people who want to shoot film. It's a subset of people who
> are
> > photographers. The default is to use digital. Because it is good enough
> for
> > anything and everything.
> >
> > OTOH, if people want to shoot film, let them shoot film.
> >
> > (just sold my Nikon LS-9000 and a left kidney to buy a Imacon 868)
> >
> > --
> > "Some People Drive, We Are Driven"
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> > richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram
> > <https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
"Some People Drive, We Are Driven"
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram
<https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto>