Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Film vs... digital? Why are we still having this debate?
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:16:14 -0500
References: <XZDl1v02a07g8Sg01ZDnjQ>

One painter uses acrylics, another oils. What's the difference?

-----Original Message----- 
From: Richard Man 
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 4:13 PM 
To: Leica Users Group 
Subject: [Leica] Film vs... digital? Why are we still having this debate? 

I shot 130+ sheets of 4x5 portra in 2 long weekends a couple weeks ago.

Film is for people who want to shoot film. It's a subset of people who are
photographers. The default is to use digital. Because it is good enough for
anything and everything.

OTOH, if people want to shoot film, let them shoot film.

(just sold my Nikon LS-9000 and a left kidney to buy a Imacon 868)

-- 
"Some People Drive, We Are Driven"
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram
<https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Film vs... digital? Why are we still having this debate?)