Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/11/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the vote of confidence in the M9, Scott, but there seems to be a number of secondhand Sony A7ii bodies out there at the moment on the auction sites, and only a couple of M9 bodies, so, as the cash difference is significant, and as I don't have a large amount of Leica glass, but do have lots of other glass, the Sony seems the more practical option for a couple of years. I will go for a digital Leica probably a secondhand M240 in the future. Douglas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Gregory" <scottgregory at mac.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 12:24 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] reuesting info from Leica > Douglas just a thought in reply to your M9 comment. I just got mine back > yesterday from Leica US. About a 5-6 week turnaround so not the horror > stories I hear from some. The camera has been wonderful and I've used it > for 6 years now. Hope to keep it a lot longer. > > Scott > >> On Nov 2, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Douglas Barry <imra at iol.ie> wrote: >> >> Yes Doug, Leica problems and hence the subsequent service seems to make >> for dismal reading. I think I'm finally going to go ahead and buy a Sony >> full frame A7 or A7ii as the Leica option - a 2nd hand M9 - is looking >> more problematic and much as though I'd like one, the scare stories are >> unlikely to lead to happiness. >> >> Being realistic, the amount of photography I do is now harmless, and it >> would be stupid to buy an M240 just to have it sitting around with little >> use. So the Sony solution with adaptors seems the best as it would enable >> me to use the large number of old lenses from various manufacturers >> easily. >> >> Douglas >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Herr" >> <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> >> To: <lug at leica-users.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 7:08 PM >> Subject: Re: [Leica] reuesting info from Leica >> >> >>> Steve Barbour wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> I have been trying to determine the status of my M9 for a job that is up >>> and >>> coming. Phone message response by machine is "person is not >>> available". >>> e-mails and other forms of communication are simply not answered. >>> >>> How can I reach them? >>> <<< >>> >>> Let me know went/if you find out. I sent my 280 APO to Leica for repair >>> nearly seven months ago and apart from a confirmation of receipt in late >>> April I've heard nothing from them. A few times I've been able to get >>> through to a real person on the phone and the promised response ("in two >>> weeks"; "on Monday") never happens. I'd have to be insanely stupid to >>> spend any more money on any Leica equipment before their service issues >>> are resolved. >>> >>> Doug Herr >>> Birdman of Sacramento >>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >>> http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >