Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I actually saw the prototype at the LHSA convention. Small, very well made, good to great glass. Speed is no real issue in digital and there are other options if you want shallow dof in your wide shots. Realistic lens for most photographers especially newer less affluent that want a real Leica(read asia)lens. I think Leica is trying to address non-used pricing as well as calling up heritage and collectors. On Oct 19, 2016 2:10 PM, "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > Jim, > > I think it is all about size and form factor. For a Leica owner who just > shoots daytime snapshots, it is perfectly adequate, and, with the high ISOs > now available, it will work ok at night, as well. And, they won't get many > complaints about the RF being out of calibration. :-) > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > On 10/19/2016 12:58 PM, Jim Shulman wrote: > >> Suddenly it's 1955. That was the speed of their "replacement" Summaron >> (the one that replaced the f6.3 model!) Meanwhile, Nikon and Canon were >> making 3.5 28s in LTM (with Canon going one better, with a 2.8) It was a >> strangely obsolete max aperture then, and certainly now. >> >> Go figure.... >> Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >