Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:03:38 -0400

Its just that the unaided eye does not really have a frame it looks through.
Its sees the whole room but is only concentrated on a small object in it.
Its a tele mounted in a super wide.
So its darned hard to impossible to state what the angle of the unaided eye
is.  Its a sharp 180mm in a bokeh infused 12mm. I don't think we can round
these two numbers off and come up with something. As I understand it some
people use their peripheral vision differently.


On 9/21/16 4:58 PM, "Lew Schwartz" <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I believe that Bill C. is correct. It's relative to what you see with your
> unaided eye.
> 
> 
> -Lew Schwartz
> 
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> The normal camera lens now if you want to define normal as "most used by
>> the
>> most photogs most often for most stuff" is the wide angle zoom. Which has
>> come to be the 18 to 35 zoom. This for photojournalists as well as
>> commercial photogs and probably fine art dudes too. It started out being a
>> 20 to 35. But time flew.
>> I had a 12-24 for my cropped Nikons which translates to that.
>> Not sure if I'm going to get a 20mm 1.8 to go with my new 35 1.8 and 50 
>> 1.8
>> and do some quick back and forth running or go with the zoom.
>> 
>> --
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Reply from hjwulff at gmail.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)