Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 14:13:05 -0700
References: <3102AFDA-E450-4F4B-AB03-A7A8973AE34A@fastmail.com> <7BCAB2D88BEE4631BE521C119C7DED49@Family> <90B0C0EE-5AE3-4F98-8BB9-320F53FEC347@icloud.com> <79fb744e-74f8-58ce-5ba0-79d6cf19e7c5@lighttube.net> <BD577D48-2917-4446-880C-F209BB4F3358@frozenlight.eu> <ef0b7abf-0169-7ea0-641b-883de719b63a@summaventures.com>

> On Sep 17, 2016, at 1:36 PM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am using the 35mm f2 Fuji on the XE-2 and X-Pro 1 which is about 45.5
> equivalent (taking 1.3 as the equivalence ratio). I was "sold" the 35 as a 
> "sort
> of equivalent" to a 50mm f2. It works great too.
> 
> Still wish I could find an adaptor (to M) for my f1.4 50mm MC-Rokkor, a 
> truly
> wonderful lens, if bulky.

looks available, sent separately.

steve


> 
> Peter
> 
> On 17/09/2016 16:47, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> It sure is. And very sharp too. It has become my most-used lens. If I go 
>> out with the Fuji and just one lens, this is the one.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>> YNWA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 17 Sep 2016, at 15:58, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That is a nice format.  Both Nathan and I are using the Fujinon 27mm, 
>>> which gives the equivalent of a 40 full frame.  It is a very handy 
>>> walk-about lens.
>>> 
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>> 
>>> On 9/17/2016 8:53 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>>> I love my little 40 mm Summicron
>>>> 
>>>> a note off the iPad, George
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> That?s where I?m coming from. And wondering why we don?t see more 
>>>>> 40-something focal length lenses.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ===========================================================
> Dr Peter Dzwig                                
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from dennis.leicam6 at gmail.com (Dennis Kushner) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
In reply to: Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)