Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you need a 300mm lens then yes, Leica is not for you. As far as 100mm macro, the 100mm Apo Macro Elmarit is the best lens I have ever held in my hands, period. I am no fan boy, but this is simply the greatest lens I have ever experienced. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 13 Sep 2016, at 21:52, Frank Verizon 2 2016 <red735i at verizon.net> > wrote: > > Think about the photographer that wants to use a 300 mm or a 100mm macro > lens on his SL.... How else to do this? At this time, there is no > solution using Leca glass, without a lot of compromises. > > I admit it is ridiculous if all you want is a 24-90 zoom lens.... > > But until there is a more complete lineup of Leica glass, i find this > solution to be quite good. > > Note : I do not have nor lust for a SL. I can not afford nor justify the > cost nor weight. > > Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net > > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > On Sep 13, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> > wrote: > > Which, given that lenses are Leica?s greatest strength, seems absurd. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information