Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for looking. I sent you the comparison images. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA On 6/18/2016 12:19 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > This one looks fine in every respect. It would be interesting to see the > unprocessed image just to have an idea of how much you had to do. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> > http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 16 Jun 2016, at 22:12, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: >> >> I took the Culminar 85/2.8 out for one last checkout. I like this focal >> length when used on the Fuji, but continue to find that the uncoated lens >> elements produce a very low contrast image for me. With a lot of post >> processing, I can get usable images, but feel that a modern, autofocus, >> lens would be a better choice. >> >> Here is one image showing customer service at the airport. >> >> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Customer+Service.tif.html >> >> Comments and critiques welcomed and appreciated. >> >> -- >> Jim Nichols >> Tullahoma, TN USA >> >> -- >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus >> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ >> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >