Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] m9 vs m240?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:07:50 -0500
References: <CANiFQ-1O0-hzvh3-H0yziXkrxb9v8bTDxL_gBOvMLa1T26OB6w@mail.gmail.com> <2E58D7C7-376A-4BE9-89E4-602A68F42415@gmail.com> <CA+yJO1C7VYe4h0TBmzZ5TP_vMJ3kEEM7nz+2Qg3WidDbvAPxJw@mail.gmail.com> <BC94E78C-9CEF-4E60-9DE3-99D71118834D@gmail.com>

I just tried it and counted to 2 before it woke up - almost instant.  Is
there some setting somewhere that controls that, maybe for battery
conservation?

Tina

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:

> What about wake up from sleep?
>
> Leo Wesson
> leowesson.com
>
> > On Mar 10, 2016, at 15:47, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
> >
> > I just tried mine to be sure, but as soon as I switch the camera to "on"
> it
> > is live - before I can even get my finger on the shutter!
> >
> > Tina
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi  Kyle,
> >>
> >> The 240 would be better on all counts except #1.  I find it slower to
> wake
> >> up than the M9.
> >>
> >> Leo Wesson
> >> leowesson.com
> >>
> >>> On Mar 10, 2016, at 15:31, kyle cassidy <leicaslacker at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking about upgrading from the m9 to the 240 ...
> >>>
> >>> my main problems with the 9 are:
> >>>
> >>> 1) sloooow wakeup time. i'm often like "take the picture! take the
> >>> picture!" (mashes button, nothing happens, nothing happens ... bird
> flies
> >>> past ... long pause ... click!)
> >>>
> >>> 2) noisy iso -- anytying over 400 is almost useless
> >>>
> >>> 3) slow read time to the back of camera display
> >>>
> >>> 4) shutter is NOISY
> >>>
> >>> 5) slooow shutter winding time.
> >>>
> >>> my m9 is doing ... ok, but i'm wondering if the 240 is appreciably more
> >>> awesome. i don't care about sapphire crystals or titanium body parts or
> >>> snake skin covers or whatever... just the things that make the camera
> >> work
> >>>
> >>> thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> kc
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tina Manley
> > http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
> > http://socialdocumentary.net/photographer/tinamanley
> > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley
http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
http://socialdocumentary.net/photographer/tinamanley
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/


In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)