Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:26:49 -0500

Those are not names. Those are code words in effect numbers with letters
used instead of numbers.


On 2/22/16 3:51 PM, "Piers Hemy" <piers.hemy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Easy one, Bob. Just don't confuse it with a BEOON.
> 
> Piers (well equipped with both macro stands)
> On 22 Feb 2016 7:15 p.m., "Robert Baron" <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> ===On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Richard Man <
>> richard at richardmanphoto.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Not that I am interested, but who is the genius that thinks it's clarity
>> to
>>> have numbers for camera models?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> I remember when many European companies, including Leica, thought that
>> using names rather than model numbers for products was a less confusing
>> method.
>> 
>> How many of you now know (without Googling) what a Boowu is?
>> 
>> --Bob
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?)
In reply to: Message from piers.hemy at gmail.com (piers@hemy.org) ([Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?)