Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?
From: piers.hemy at gmail.com (piers@hemy.org)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:51:13 +0000
References: <CAF8hL-FayL2jrORWQXcYRmsJ+hKuqQb9CHxBJJfEg6iHfrFi=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4y7gzJkKrgxUYgSqvg3sTncMOh92Gw9P3Vukh7dePS0mGpjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 
Easy one, Bob. Just don't confuse it with a BEOON.

Piers (well equipped with both macro stands)
On 22 Feb 2016 7:15 p.m., "Robert Baron" <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> ===On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Richard Man <
> richard at richardmanphoto.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Not that I am interested, but who is the genius that thinks it's clarity
> to
> > have numbers for camera models?
> >
> >
> >
> I remember when many European companies, including Leica, thought that
> using names rather than model numbers for products was a less confusing
> method.
>
> How many of you now know (without Googling) what a Boowu is?
>
> --Bob
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?)
 In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Type 240, 246, 262? Who made these up?)