Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Crew, There wasn't, nor is there anything wrong with a Hasselblad if you are using the 2 1/4 120 film cameras. During part of my Leica life I also used 3 Hasselblad cameras when shooting for some clients and magazines. As the Photo editor or the art directors called the shot on acceptable film size! ERGO? If you wanted to do assignments for their magazine you worked with their size. Now maybe what you lads are talking about is some "Mickey Mouse?" China made 35mm size badged Hasselblad that could well be a piece of copy-cat junk? But there isn't anything wrong, nor was there anything with a 2 1/4 120 film size Hassie as they were a wonderful machine to work with. Only the odd time the 2 1/4 Sq.format was a bit of a pain in the ass! cheers, Dr. ted -----Original Message----- From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ken Carney Sent: January-12-16 4:59 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica SL: Worst Camera of the Year? I thought Hasselblad's were good cameras? Used by the astronauts and all that? On 1/12/2016 11:03 AM, Robert Baron wrote: > http://photorumors.com/2016/01/11/2015-worst-camera-of-the-year-vote-now/ > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus