Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:45:34 +0100
References: <85CF3294-5166-4C64-9317-FBC5683AA90B@gmail.com> <04A121903231481385EA67DB4DACE377@Family>

 From the lighting, it's more of a Martin Parr.

VG family Christmas pic - amazing depth, almost 3D

Cheers
Douglas

On 05.01.2016 12:03, Douglas Barry wrote:
> More an Amard to us Eurocentrics :-)
>
> A good one though with a lot of activity and 
> interaction!
>
> Douglas
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe" 
> <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2016 5:50 PM
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
>
>
>> I was editing my Xmas photos when I hit upon this 
>> one which reminded me of N. Rockwell's compositions, 
>> and of E. Hopper's use of artificial light.
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/2015-Noel+__+Mutz-Hopper+CLR-1722.jpg.html
>>  
>>
>>
>> Does it work for you? or not?
>>
>> All comments and suggestions most welcome.
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for 
>> more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for 
> more information
>



Replies: Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)
In reply to: Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)