Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Auto-focus for me. Tina On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote: > Not that I am Leica :-), but what are your criteria for a better-than-M240 > M? > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Agree. And I'm hoping they will come out with a new M that will meet some > > needs of mine currently not met... > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Leica does not claim the SL as the M solution. Only that it can take M > > > lens. For product sales, it makes a lot of sense to keep the lines > > separate > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > I decided to plop down the ~$35 for the Reid Reviews. I wanted to > know > > > how > > > > my 35/2 performed on the SL. He tests that lens specifically as well > > as a > > > > few other wides. > > > > As he asks not to "distribute that information", I can only say that, > > as > > > a > > > > landscape photographer and one who also shoots below f/5.6 in other > > > > situations, I am not the least bit interested in the SL anymore... > > > > Best, > > > > Bob > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto > // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Tina Manley http:// <http://t.sidekickopen28.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=3f8ad767-65c9-4969-afcb-309a4d4e20c2> www.tinamanley.com http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/