[Leica] SL Review

[richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)]

Not that I am Leica :-), but what are your criteria for a better-than-M240
M?

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> Agree. And I'm hoping they will come out with a new M that will meet some
> needs of mine currently not met...
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Leica does not claim the SL as the M solution. Only that it can take M
> > lens. For product sales, it makes a lot of sense to keep the lines
> separate
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I decided to plop down the ~$35 for the Reid Reviews. I wanted to know
> > how
> > > my 35/2 performed on the SL. He tests that lens specifically as well
> as a
> > > few other wides.
> > > As he asks not to "distribute that information", I can only say that,
> as
> > a
> > > landscape photographer and one who also shoots below f/5.6 in other
> > > situations, I am not the least bit interested in the SL anymore...
> > > Best,
> > > Bob
>
-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto