Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:32:12 -0500

Having a discussion of which Leica R or M lenses are bad or good without
mention of Erwin is a bit odd. A while ago Erwin's writings dominated the
Leica website. His "Leica Compendium" is now considered a classic and its
mainly about this topic I see you get one for only $349.99 on Amazon.  When
I first joined the LUG he was a major player in our discussions for many
years. Here's his main R page.
http://www.imx.nl/photo/leica/lenses/lenses/page88.html
And you don't have to give him any damn money.
To read a lens review by Erwin Puts and not be impressed would be quite a
thing.
I certainly am not impressed when I look at a chat group and one person is
saying  "I found the 90mm to be a bit flat" countered by another person
saying "yea the 100 is much sharper" with a URL pointing to a jpg of his kid
or grand kid low rez to put it mildly as you can just make out if its maybe
in focus or not. And both people have long ago sold it and gotten something
else. Which they then sold.

Whenever Erwin's name is brought up on the LUG the same two idiots chime in
about how he's paid off by Leica and a number of other dumb rude good old
boy stuff. Its absurd and a damn shame people who take this stuff seriously
cant get the respect they certainly deserve and get everywhere else.


-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?)